Administrators, trusted-editors
1,422
edits
Itemswapper: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "CC1" to "CC1"
Tylersontag (talk | contribs) m (Tylersontag moved page itemswapper to Itemswapper over redirect: revert) |
Indyindeed (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* ''Random'' itemswappers allow for many different paths, where there is no unique route. One famous example is [[Which One Next?]] by [[Jimmy Vermeer]]. | * ''Random'' itemswappers allow for many different paths, where there is no unique route. One famous example is [[Which One Next?]] by [[Jimmy Vermeer]]. | ||
* ''Structured'' itemswappers follow a strict pattern, where one stage explicitly leads to the next. [[Smorgasbord]]'s southwest section is structured. | * ''Structured'' itemswappers follow a strict pattern, where one stage explicitly leads to the next. [[Smorgasbord]]'s southwest section is structured. | ||
* ''Single-themed'' itemswappers usually stick with one type of tile: [[lock]]s, [[boot]]s or [[computer chip]]s. One of the most famous itemswappers of all time, based solely on a giant jumble of locks and keys, is [[David Stolp]]'s ''too many keys''. A [[CC1]] example is [[Steam]]. | * ''Single-themed'' itemswappers usually stick with one type of tile: [[lock]]s, [[boot]]s or [[computer chip]]s. One of the most famous itemswappers of all time, based solely on a giant jumble of locks and keys, is [[David Stolp]]'s ''too many keys''. A [[Chip's Challenge 1|CC1]] example is [[Steam]]. | ||
* ''Eclectic'' itemswappers add many kinds of obstacles, often adding unconventional twists such as using [[monster]]s to remove [[destructive obstacle]]s as a stage. | * ''Eclectic'' itemswappers add many kinds of obstacles, often adding unconventional twists such as using [[monster]]s to remove [[destructive obstacle]]s as a stage. | ||