Please create an account or Login! Have fun!

Editing Spirals corruption

Jump to navigation Jump to search
You are not logged in. While you can edit without logging in, your IP address will be recorded publicly, along with the time and date, in this page's history. It is sometimes possible for others to identify you with this information. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits. Messages sent to your IP can be viewed on your talk page.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 17: Line 17:
|bold difficulty lynx = 3
|bold difficulty lynx = 3
|bold complexity lynx = 1
|bold complexity lynx = 1
}}'''Spirals corruption''' is a misnomer, referring to a copy of [[MSCC]] which shipped with the original [[Chip's Challenge for Atari Lynx|Lynx]] version of [[Spirals]], rather than the version edited to work with [[MS ruleset|Microsoft rules]].  The difference is a single tile: at [[grid]] coordinates (29, 13), Lynx has a [[thin wall]], but MSCC changes it to a [[floor]]. The difference is so drastic that the Lynx level was initially believed to be a [[glitch]].
}}
'''Spirals corruption''' is an alternate version of [[Spirals]] in some versions of [[Microsoft's version of Chip's Challenge|MSCC]] with one small difference: at [[grid]] coordinates (29, 13) is a [[thin wall]] instead of a [[floor]] space, which causes a ''much'' harder level worthy of a 5 star luck rating. This was formerly believed to be a [[glitch]], but is now known to be the original version of the level, explained below.


The difficulty in the original Spirals was apparently not noticed until after the initial release of MSCC. Although the level was altered to fix the issue, some early copies of Spirals generally found in Windows Entertainment Pack 4 versions of the MS Chip's Challenge — made it into player hands before that happened.
The cause of this alternate level is theorized by [[Ruben Spaans]] to be a result of the conversion between [[MS ruleset|MS]] and [[Lynx ruleset|Lynx]], which caused the [[Transparency Glitch]], [[boosting]] and [[Controller and Boss Glitch]], among with most of the other current glitches known. The programmers appear to have done very little playtesting in the MSCC emulation, and found that Spirals was exceedingly difficult because of the different rules of [[walker]] movement in MS. Although they edited the level, some copies of Spirals, generally found in Windows Entertainment Pack 4 versions of the MS Chip's Challenge, never received the edit.


== Background ==
The change in difficulty comes down to a change in the behavior of [[walker]]s.
In Lynx, when a [[walker]] hits an obstacle while trying to move, it will choose a random direction and try to move that way instead.  Crucially, it will choose ''any'' random direction, including the direction it's already facing.  Thus, if a walker goes down a hallway one cell wide and hits a dead end, it only has a 1 in 4 chance of backtracking each tic.  If more walkers are coming up behind it, there's a decent chance they will bunch up and bumble around for a while.
In MS, a blocked walker chooses a random ''open'' direction.  A walker in the same dead end will thus '''immediately''' turn around and head back the same way.  Even multiple walkers trapped in the same hallway will function akin to a cannon, shooting them all back out as quickly as possible.
The removal of the single wall changes a dead end to a corner leading into a T junction, providing a release valve that lets the walkers spread out into other parts of the level
Spirals also spawns walkers also more frequently in general under MS.  When a new clone is created in Lynx, it only has a 1 in 4 chance of making it past the first corner after the [[red button]]; it's more likely to cause a traffic jam and prevent too many walkers from escaping into the level too quickly.  In MS, a new clone will ''always'' take that corner, ensuring a steady stream of new walkers.
== History ==
This corruption was first brought to the full attention of the public, although isolated reports had been made, on March 23, 1998, in a discovery by Erik Arfeuille:
This corruption was first brought to the full attention of the public, although isolated reports had been made, on March 23, 1998, in a discovery by Erik Arfeuille:


Line 39: Line 28:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


[[Ruben Spaans]] attempted the corrupted level, and found it could indeed be solved with a Texas-size portion of luck, reporting a time of 300.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20200112155728/http://www.mywingsbooks.com:80/chips/cc-tipsmaps/tips/T088.shtml Ruben's score report and 300 solution, posted on the Charter Chipsters forum]</ref> The full text of his theory is quoted as follows:
[[Ruben Spaans]] attempted the corrupted level, and found it could indeed be solved with a Texas-size portion of luck, reporting a time of 300.<ref>[https://www.mywingsbooks.com/chips/cc-tipsmaps/tips/T088.shtml Ruben's score report and 300 solution, posted on the Charter Chipsters forum]</ref> The full text of his theory is quoted as follows:


<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Line 47: Line 36:
Since this time, the corrupted version's [[bold time]] has reached 304, achieved with turning 3D U 2D 4R 3L at the intersections, and with at most three moves lost. Though still significant, the luck needed is not tremendous, particularly if the player is a bit mindful of how many [[walker]]s are created in the first moments of the level. If they see less than ten [[walker]]s before picking up the second [[computer chip]], then their chances of at least completing the level are decent. As for fixing a corrupt level, instead of using a hex editor, edit the level in a [[level editor]].
Since this time, the corrupted version's [[bold time]] has reached 304, achieved with turning 3D U 2D 4R 3L at the intersections, and with at most three moves lost. Though still significant, the luck needed is not tremendous, particularly if the player is a bit mindful of how many [[walker]]s are created in the first moments of the level. If they see less than ten [[walker]]s before picking up the second [[computer chip]], then their chances of at least completing the level are decent. As for fixing a corrupt level, instead of using a hex editor, edit the level in a [[level editor]].


== Walkthrough ==
== References ==
{{#ev:youtube|O4zDTUQ8s8Q}}
<references/>


== See also ==
== See also ==
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20200219052949/http://www.mywingsbooks.com/chips/cc-chips/hlp-bugs.shtml Not All The Bugs Are Yellow:] [[Alice Voith]]'s analysis of the then-known glitches
*[https://www.mywingsbooks.com/chips/cc-chips/hlp-bugs.shtml Not All The Bugs Are Yellow:] [[Alice Voith]]'s analysis of the then-known glitches


== References ==
== Walkthrough ==
<references/>
{{#ev:youtube|O4zDTUQ8s8Q}}


{{Level Progression|Cityblock|Block Buster}}
{{Level Progression|Cityblock|Block Buster}}
[[Category:Terminology]]
[[Category:Terminology]]
Please note that all contributions to Chip's Challenge Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Chip's Challenge Wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Your changes will be visible immediately.
  • If you want to test editing, try the sandbox.
  • On talk pages, please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).