Please create an account or Login! Have fun!

User:Indyindeed/Infobox Test: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{| class="wikitable infobox plainlinks" style="width: 27%; align: right; text-align: center;" |+ Frost Rings<br>300px<br><br> |- ! width="1%" now...")
 
m (mobile test)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="wikitable infobox plainlinks" style="width: 27%; align: right; text-align: center;"
{| class="wikitable infobox plainlinks" style="width: 27%; align: right; text-align: center;"
|+ Frost Rings<br>[[Image:CCLP2 Level 120.png|300px]]<br><br>
|+ <center>Frost Rings<br>[[Image:CCLP2 Level 120.png|300px]]<br><br></center>
|-
|-
! width="1%" nowrap="nowrap"|'''Level set'''
! width="1%" nowrap="nowrap"|'''Level set'''

Revision as of 22:13, 23 June 2019

This page is purely for demonstration purposes, to showcase ideas for the formatting of the new infoboxes coming soon to the Wiki. It will most likely be deleted shortly following their addition.


Notes:

  • Image as part of header: optional, but would look slightly better in my opinion
  • Smaller width: reduced to 27% down from the current infoboxes' 30% (if you think this is too small or too big, feel free to change it)
  • Separated passwords / chip counts: all CCLXP2 levels marked with LX have their passwords mirrored, and some CCLXP2 levels have different chip count levels
  • Unreachable chips note: looks better to me this way than to store in a separate box, hoping the community doesn't decide against this
  • No box for hint; the level does not have a hint
    • CCLXP2 levels marked with * or LX have unreadable hints added to them (assuming the level doesn't already have a hint) saying:
      "This level has been tweaked from its original version." or
      "This level is not solvable in MS mode."
      I think we simply shouldn't add those to the infoboxes at all
  • No box for bold luck; the level has no luck-based elements


Side note: Castle Moat, Cypher II, and In the Slime have multiple designers, so perhaps it would be best to pluralize "Designer" on these three levels (hoping that doesn't sound like a nitpick)