1,356
edits
Please create an account or Login! Have fun!
Tylersontag (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tylersontag (talk | contribs) (Removing example of when block donut doesn't work because it's both obvious and not similar to typical block donut situations) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The Block Donut Rule is going around to the ''right'' side of the blocks and moving block 2 L, then pushing block 1 U and 3L into a bomb. The two paths form a donut, which gives the rule its name. Compare this to starting by pushing block 2 R from the left side. While the Block Donut Rule's path is initially 2 moves longer, it places the block 2 spaces closer to its target, saving ''four'' moves, and thus gaining two moves net. Not all situations trade the two moves; sometimes, Chip will already be on the opposite side, and therefore the Block Donut Rule will be worth four extra moves. | The Block Donut Rule is going around to the ''right'' side of the blocks and moving block 2 L, then pushing block 1 U and 3L into a bomb. The two paths form a donut, which gives the rule its name. Compare this to starting by pushing block 2 R from the left side. While the Block Donut Rule's path is initially 2 moves longer, it places the block 2 spaces closer to its target, saving ''four'' moves, and thus gaining two moves net. Not all situations trade the two moves; sometimes, Chip will already be on the opposite side, and therefore the Block Donut Rule will be worth four extra moves. | ||
One noticable example of the Block Donut Rule in actual play is in the five-block room in the southwest of [[Mix Up]], after three of the blocks have been removed. There is a stack of two blocks in the center of the room, and moving the lower block L rather than R yields an equivalent situation to example one. | One noticable example of the Block Donut Rule in actual play is in the five-block room in the southwest of [[Mix Up]], after three of the blocks have been removed. There is a stack of two blocks in the center of the room, and moving the lower block L rather than R yields an equivalent situation to example one. |